2 ms·
It's been like this since GPT 3.5. This is not a limitation and is generally considered a natural outcome of the process. So there's no major update in the se
by F7F7F7 7mo ago
It's been like this since GPT 3.5. This is not a limitation and is generally considered a natural outcome of the process.
So there's no major update in the sense that you might be thinking. Most of the time there's not even an announcement when/if training cut offs are updated. It's just another byline.
A 6 month lag seems to be the standard across the frontier models.
- reconnecting 7mo agoI've actually started worrying that the amount of false data produced with LLMs on the public internet might provoke a situation where the knowledge cutoff becomes permanently (and silently) frozen. Like we can't trust data after 2025 because it will poison training data at scale, and models will only cover major events without capturing the finer details.
- gwern 7mo agoI agree. That's why you should write as much as you can now, if you want to get it into the LLMs (https://gwern.net/blog/2024/writing-online https://gwern.net/blog/2024/writing-online). You never know when the window will slam shut and LLM training goes 'hermetic' as they focus on 'civilization in a datacenter' where only extremely vetted whitelisted data gets included in the 'seed' and everything is reconstructed from scratch for the training value & safety.