3 ms·
That's actually not true. Here's the past 90 days in the US for Obama (blue), Romney (red) and taxes (yellow): http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=obama,+rom
by epi0Bauqu 14y ago
That's actually not true. Here's the past 90 days in the US for Obama (blue), Romney (red) and taxes (yellow): http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=obama,+romney,+taxes&date=today+3-m&cmpt=q&geo=US http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=obama,+romney,+taxes&...
If you restrict to just US news searches (as many of the inserted results are newsy), it is similar: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=obama%2C%20romney%2C%20taxes&geo=US&date=today%203-m&gprop=news&cmpt=q http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=obama%2C%20romney%2C%...
Actually a lot of election-related queries, most of which searched less than Romney and Obama transform results in this manner, e.g. social security, health care, abortion, taxes, ohio, election and many others. Just not Romney: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=romney%2C%20social%20security%2C%20taxes%2C%20health%20care%2C%20abortion&date=today%203-m&cmpt=q http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=romney%2C%20social%20...
- alanctgardner2 14y agoI'm not sure if I follow the second part. Adding more comma-separated words doesn't do anything to the other lines, this is just an overlay of multiple graphs. Adding or removing 'taxes' doesn't do anything.
- epi0Bauqu 14y agoSorry for not being clear (was also trying to not be verbose!). All it shows is that all those terms were searched a lot less than Romney for the past 90 days, and yet they all were found to alter subsequent search results after searching them (unlike Romney).