3 ms·
On that basis Richard Dawkins matches the Christian part.
by graemep 8mo ago
On that basis Richard Dawkins matches the Christian part.
- ben_w 8mo agoIt is entirely unimportant how Richard Dawkins is categorised, isn't it? Last I checked, the "pro-natalist" part isn't there for Dawkins, so how other things modify a pro-natalist stance don't connect to anything.
- graemep 8mo agoI am suggesting that a definition of "Christian" that includes Richard Dawkins is flawed.
- ben_w 8mo agoYou're the one who chose to combine Musk and Dawkins in the same group here with "cultural christian", that's absolutely a straw man if this is what you're doing. I mean, your own link up there has a sub-heading of "Everyone has their own definition". Especially when you're replying to "he seems to clear favor white Christian people and himself especially" rather than "is a Christian". Queen Victoria wasn't a feminist, neither.
- graemep 8mo agoYou are saying they are Christian in the same sense of being "cultural Christians" rather than actual Christians. if you say one is a Christian it follows that the other is a Christian. The point is that given Musk is clearly not an actual Christian he cannot favour Christians "himself included".