3 ms·
Because at the time of WebAssembly announcement all the doomsayers were screaming at the top of their lungs: "JS/TS are dead! Serious developer would never choo
by wiseowise 7mo ago
Because at the time of WebAssembly announcement all the doomsayers were screaming at the top of their lungs: "JS/TS are dead! Serious developer would never choose it! Finally I can have my <x> in the browser!"
- circuit10 7mo agoThat isn’t (currently) a goal of WebAssembly: https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/ https://webassembly.org/docs/faq/ “Is WebAssembly trying to replace JavaScript? No! WebAssembly is designed to be a complement to, not replacement of, JavaScript. While WebAssembly will, over time, allow many languages to be compiled to the Web, JavaScript has an incredible amount of momentum and will remain the single, privileged (as described above) dynamic language of the Web.”
- wiseowise 7mo agoGood luck convincing JS haters.