It's amusing because it's essentially "much ado about nothing". It's also contradictory, as the claim is AI "slop" destroys value, yet here is a case - and I'm

It's amusing because it's essentially "much ado about nothing". It's also contradictory, as the claim is AI "slop" destroys value, yet here is a case - and I'm pretty sure there are others - where value isn't destroyed, which destroyed said claim. The problem isn't the use of AI for generating/fixing content; it's the publishing of bad content, which AI magnifies, as out magnifies other things.