3 ms·
Was this authorised by QNTM?
by SideburnsOfDoom 7mo ago
Was this authorised by QNTM?
- GCUMstlyHarmls 7mo agoI think all SCP content is creative commons share alike (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/), so I don't think he actually needs to -- assuming this is based on SCP and not the book. I know the book had some revisions done to make it legally distinct from the SCP stories for copyright purposes.
- v9v 7mo agoIn one of the youtube comments the director says that they contacted the author and got permission.
- rtkwe 7mo agoDoesn't need to be, the default license for SCP Wiki is Creative Commons BY-SA so you only have to attribute the source and distribute under the same license. I don't see that mentioned so it might technically violate the license unless they negotiated directly with qntm under a different agreement. That's the tricky thing with licenses, you never know if they have so unless the original creator is raising a stink you can't know and legally you have no grounds to object even if they are violating the license.