5 ms·
Pleasant surprise: someone saying "open source" and actually meaning Open Source. It looks like the weights are Apache-2.0 licensed.
by JoshTriplett 7mo ago
Pleasant surprise: someone saying "open source" and actually meaning Open Source. It looks like the weights are Apache-2.0 licensed.
- jasonjmcghee 7mo agoBased on community definitions I've seen, this is considered "open weights". If you can't reproduce the model, it's not "open source"
- xpe 7mo agoYes “open weights” conveys the reality more clearly: merely having the parameters is very different than able to run a process that creates them. Without openness of the full process start to finish, much is hidden.* Remember, language is what we make it. Dictionaries are useful catalogs of usage but we make the judgment calls. * Even with the process, much is not well understood! / The ethics of releasing an open weights model at some capability level is a separate discussion.