3 ms·
National governments maybe. Local ones aren’t, and it’s those that fill with nimbys and maintain the majority of control over planning
by hdgvhicv 8mo ago
National governments maybe. Local ones aren’t, and it’s those that fill with nimbys and maintain the majority of control over planning
- nxobject 8mo agoEveryone wants the datacenter somewhere in their country for sovereignty... just not next to them. Quelle surprise. At this point you may as well build supermarkets on top of them just to sell 'em to people.
- fc417fc802 8mo agoThey're so absurdly capital intensive at this point that they probably ought to be buried at least 50 meters down. If any reasonably capable countries ever face off directly they'll probably be one of the first things to go.
- aitchnyu 8mo agoUS suburban development followed nuclear war threats. Will history repeat itself by unconcentrating servers?
- fc417fc802 8mo agoGiven the rapidly increasing power densities I expect it would be far more straightforward to bury them. I believe a single 42u rack of last gen nvidia hardware is already more energy intensive than the HVAC for a mcmansion. However it occurs to me that the electrical grid becomes a high priority military target in this scenario. Maybe datacenters should go all in on building their own power plants.