3 ms·

You claim in a sibling comment that you have engaged with my points, yet when I talk to you about it you just shut down the conversation. You really aren't goi

You claim in a sibling comment that you have engaged with my points, yet when I talk to you about it you just shut down the conversation. You really aren't going to respond to any of those points? You stand by your complaint DNSSEC being "government controlled PKI" when TLDs are a government controlled naming system? And your alternative is to advocate for privately owned PKI run by companies with no accountability that are also much more vulnerable to attack? Campaigning against cryptographically signing DNS records is a weird life choice man.

tptacek 7mo ago
You're on tilt. It's fine that we disagree about DNSSEC. You seem very angry that you? (it was you, I gather?) wrote a post disagreeing with my post, and I didn't go back and revise my post to capture all the arguments you had that I disagreed with. Sorry, but not sorry. This is just crudding up the thread now though. If I've said something in this thread that you disagree with, say so and say why (you'll need something better than "I wrote about this 11 years ago and you weren't nice enough to me about it"). Right now, all you're doing is yelling about a post I wrote 11 years ago and haven't cited once on this thread. Of course, as you know, I stand by that post. But it's not germane to the thread.
- indolering 7mo ago
  > You're on tilt. I'm upset that your incorrect arguments have gotten so much traction that the internet is a less safe place for it. > wrote a post disagreeing with my post, and I didn't go back and revise my post to capture all the arguments you had that I disagreed with. Sorry, but not sorry. You in a sibling thread: > I feel pretty confident that the search bar refutes this claim you're making. What you're trying to argue is that I've avoided opportunities to argue about DNSSEC on HN. Seems... unlikely. It seemed like you wanted to have this discussion but I guess not. > yelling about a post I wrote 11 years ago and haven't cited once on this thread. ... Of course, as you know, I stand by that post. But it's not germane to the thread. Do you know what comment thread you are in? I complained about FUD and cited your blogpost. This is what this thread is about.
  - tptacek 7mo ago
    Have you considered that telling me how influential my writing on this topic has been is not a great way to get me to stop writing?
    - indolering 7mo ago
      [flagged]
      - tptacek 7mo ago
        It's OK. I'm working on another post right now, titled "Stick A Fork In It", and you can write a rebuttal, "Pull The Fork Out Of It" and we'll get another chance to do this. We'll see who's more influential. ;) I'm tickled a the idea that I get to take credit for its demise, though I don't think that's entirely fair. Either way: we're witnessing its agonal breathing. This is an easy call.
        indolering 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        tptacek 7mo ago
        I'm not kidding. I've been meaning to write the post for a long time, but some stuff is about to happen to make the prediction clearer. I'm not just talking about the new post to mess with you (I don't know who you are).
        indolering 7mo ago
        Then why the trolling? You claim to be interested in engaging in a substantive conversation or having done so in the past but when I try, you just insult me and announce that my advocacy for DNSSEC has inspired you to go hate on it more.

tptacek 7mo ago

You're on tilt. It's fine that we disagree about DNSSEC. You seem very angry that you? (it was you, I gather?) wrote a post disagreeing with my post, and I didn't go back and revise my post to capture all the arguments you had that I disagreed with. Sorry, but not sorry. This is just crudding up the thread now though. If I've said something in this thread that you disagree with, say so and say why (you'll need something better than "I wrote about this 11 years ago and you weren't nice enough to me about it"). Right now, all you're doing is yelling about a post I wrote 11 years ago and haven't cited once on this thread. Of course, as you know, I stand by that post. But it's not germane to the thread.

indolering 7mo ago
> You're on tilt. I'm upset that your incorrect arguments have gotten so much traction that the internet is a less safe place for it. > wrote a post disagreeing with my post, and I didn't go back and revise my post to capture all the arguments you had that I disagreed with. Sorry, but not sorry. You in a sibling thread: > I feel pretty confident that the search bar refutes this claim you're making. What you're trying to argue is that I've avoided opportunities to argue about DNSSEC on HN. Seems... unlikely. It seemed like you wanted to have this discussion but I guess not. > yelling about a post I wrote 11 years ago and haven't cited once on this thread. ... Of course, as you know, I stand by that post. But it's not germane to the thread. Do you know what comment thread you are in? I complained about FUD and cited your blogpost. This is what this thread is about.
- tptacek 7mo ago
  Have you considered that telling me how influential my writing on this topic has been is not a great way to get me to stop writing?
  - indolering 7mo ago
    [flagged]
    - tptacek 7mo ago
      It's OK. I'm working on another post right now, titled "Stick A Fork In It", and you can write a rebuttal, "Pull The Fork Out Of It" and we'll get another chance to do this. We'll see who's more influential. ;) I'm tickled a the idea that I get to take credit for its demise, though I don't think that's entirely fair. Either way: we're witnessing its agonal breathing. This is an easy call.
      - indolering 7mo ago
        [flagged]
        tptacek 7mo ago
        I'm not kidding. I've been meaning to write the post for a long time, but some stuff is about to happen to make the prediction clearer. I'm not just talking about the new post to mess with you (I don't know who you are).
        indolering 7mo ago
        Then why the trolling? You claim to be interested in engaging in a substantive conversation or having done so in the past but when I try, you just insult me and announce that my advocacy for DNSSEC has inspired you to go hate on it more.