4 ms·
You should have lost your respect for the "rationalist" "community" a long time ago. They are aggressively wrong about everything, and most of them are eugenici
by creatonez 7mo ago
You should have lost your respect for the "rationalist" "community" a long time ago. They are aggressively wrong about everything, and most of them are eugenicists.
- emsign 7mo agoThey WANT to think in absolutes which is a red flag in a person.
- Enginerrrd 7mo agoThat's not been my observation at all. Rationalists are some of the only people to really embrace fuzzy and probabilistic thinking. Am I missing something?
- danny_codes 7mo agoMaybe rationalists aren’t homogeneous? Unfortunately there are a rather concerning amount of news articles detailing cases where some subset of the rationalist community has gone off the deep end.
- unmole 7mo ago> most of them are eugenicists. [citation needed]
- creatonez 7mo agoCovered in detail here: https://reflectivealtruism.com/category/my-papers/human-biodiversity/ https://reflectivealtruism.com/category/my-papers/human-biod...
- wizzwizz4 7mo agoThey were right about Bitcoin getting big (though I'm not aware of anyone putting their money where their mouth was), and they were a decent source of information leading up to the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic (which probably saved a handful of lives). Just because they're almost always aggressively wrong, that doesn't mean they're aggressively wrong about everything.
- gzread 7mo agoIt does mean you probably shouldn't listen to them, because the expected value of listening to them is negative.
- wizzwizz4 7mo agoIt means I shouldn't listen to them in general. The LessWrongers are mainly wrong about things they think they understand: when they aren't overconfident, their improvisational skills tend to be decent. They were an excellent source of information about COVID-19, but they're a terrible source of information in the areas where they think they have expertise. When there's a crisis, it's still worth checking in to see what the LessWrongers are saying about it, because it might be very useful, and it's pretty easy to tell: you just check whether it looks like they're doing science, or Rationalism™®, and only investigate further in the rare cases where it's the former.
- SpaceManNabs 7mo agoI lost most of my respect for g...n when i noticed he he was one of those IQ guys
- blell 7mo agoWhat does that mean? People who believe in IQ?
- zone411 7mo agoRationalists were right about everything that mattered: crypto, AI, COVID... HN commentators, by contrast, were wrong about everything that mattered.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- johnfn 7mo agoRationalists were talking about AI decades before anyone else were talking about it. They were also early on COVID and crypto. They are only "aggressively wrong" about "everything" if you are, ironically, not thinking rationally about it.