3 ms·
Icaza hasn't been involved in the GNU/Linux space for years iirc, even if he has it's been limited. Also, what the fuck are you going on about? for the record,
by mghackerlady 8mo ago
Icaza hasn't been involved in the GNU/Linux space for years iirc, even if he has it's been limited. Also, what the fuck are you going on about? for the record, I also don't like the current direction of the standard "Linux" desktop but also am not schizoposting about it
Also, let's pray that's the future for GNU because I think the hurd is pretty darn cool
- anthk 8mo agoMore like schizoposting, I'm just watching what RHOS it's becoming into, some weird NT/Solaris hybrid with a non X11 layer. And, yes, Hurd with Guix it's where the potential of reproducible distros lies on. True separate services, namespaces, non-root perms to mount both local and remote FS' (no FUSE needed) and so on. This is closer to what RMS dreamt about. Hurd was about to recreate Unix but giving the users almost full rights without compromising the systems' security. And, yes, I know OG Emacs and ITS had no permissions at all and it was a 'free for all OS', but times changed. With 9front and namespaces/separate servers you get a similar environment but even more modular.