2 ms·
>I feel like this should have been 24-bit at 192 kHz. As if anybody is going to notice the difference? Even the 24-bit vs 16-bit difference is gratious (it mak
by coldtea 8mo ago
>I feel like this should have been 24-bit at 192 kHz.
As if anybody is going to notice the difference? Even the 24-bit vs 16-bit difference is gratious (it makes sense during recording and mixing, when listening it's just a check-mark item).
- danielknng 8mo ago> "As if anybody is going to notice the difference?" I don't think so, no. But since 24-bit/192 kHz music is already available in the Apple Music catalogue, I was wondering why they wouldn't just embrace it.
- Kirby64 8mo agoIt costs extra money to properly support it, so why would they? For a listening device it shouldn't matter one bit. As an output (i.e. their headphone outputs), I could see some marginal benefit for recording... but not as an input to your ears.
- mlsu 8mo agoNope. Nobody is physically capable of noticing the difference. That doesn't stop people from claiming they can, though!