4 ms·
> you’re engaging in ridiculous pedantry over whether or not people cheat in a very popular video game No, it’s abundantly clear that people cheat. We’re calli
by maccard 7mo ago
> you’re engaging in ridiculous pedantry over whether or not people cheat in a very popular video game
No, it’s abundantly clear that people cheat. We’re calling the GP comment out for claiming that overwatch turns a blind eye to cheaters and have ignored cheating in competitions.
> take a break
You’re the only person of the three of us getting very very worked up about it.
> is this a topic that genuinely calls for greater precision than this? What’s the benefit
Yes. It’s about the integrity of the discussion. There’s no point in being here if we can just post nonsense and have it accepted as truth.
- JasonADrury 7mo ago>You’re the only person of the three of us getting very very worked up about it. I'm really not? I'm just very surprised how strongly you guys are reacting to my anecdote which I never claimed to be proof of anything. Look at how strongly worded your original comment was https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47390326 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47390326 >Yes. It’s about the integrity of the discussion. There’s no point in being here if we can just post nonsense and have it accepted as truth. This is truly insane. It was Xunjin who started insisting that my clearly indicated anecdata should be some sort of proof. I never made such a claim! I never claimed that I was attempting to prove anything, that's something you two invented. Is it genuinely your stance that to protect the "integrity of the discussion", all HN comments should be verifiable?