4 ms·
There isn't the political will to remove the organized criminals who have been running Canada for decades, since the 1960s if not longer. Most people don't see
by Canada 7mo ago
There isn't the political will to remove the organized criminals who have been running Canada for decades, since the 1960s if not longer. Most people don't see how dire the circumstances are and even if they feel the country is on the wrong path they continue to believe that voting for the other guy can fix it. Same for Australia and New Zealand.
There is some hope in the British Isles. To anyone reading this who can see that simply electing this party or that party changes nothing: Take a good look at what Restore Britain is doing there, and consider supporting if you're in a position to do so. Nothing is easy, but they are drawing together more people who understand what it really means to say "no" to this system than I've ever seen organize anywhere else.
- mcintyre1994 7mo agoYou only need to look at the US to see that a government dedicated to mass deportation is more authoritarian and worse for civil liberties.
- cianmm 7mo agoReading what Restore Britain stands for just makes them seem like another set of MAGA wannabes rather than the saviours of the UK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restore_Britain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restore_Britain
- danbolt 7mo agoCan you elaborate on what you mean by “organized criminals”? I hope you’re not poisoning the well! I ask this as someone who has no love or support for the Liberals.
- foldr 7mo agoEven leaving aside the unsavory views of the party you mention, it’s quite misleading (to readers who don’t follow UK politics) to suggest that there’s any hope of it winning an election.
- dijit 7mo agoThis defeatist attitude causes the situation we’re in. Voting against someone rather than for someone is a sure-fire way to get some of the worst politicians in power as possible, they only need to be marginally less bad than the other candidate after all. Restore Britain is a populist joke btw. Greens might be my side of the fence but they’re also populist. Hard to get air time as a small party without some form of sweeping emotional appeals and “common sense” thinking, even if it’s internally inconsistent and very broad.
- blell 7mo agoHave you realised those in power right now are against you? And it seems to work very well for them.
- dijit 7mo agoNo, I live in Sweden where coalition governments are pretty common and people tend to vote for the party they agree with. Same is true in the EU elections, since their system is more democratic than the UK one. I’m intimately familiar with the shortcomings of the election system in the UK as I am British, but I’ve experienced other formulations and I can see that this line of thinking enables the abuse you claim to be dispelling by allowing it to continue..?
- ben_w 7mo ago> it’s quite misleading (to readers who don’t follow UK politics) to suggest that there’s any hope of it winning an election. I wish. Brexit was pretty unthinkable even just a few years before the referendum. And now… well, toss-up between the top 5(!) parties, because somehow the Greens and Lib Dems are polling at similar levels to Conservative and Labour, all a bit behind Reform who didn't exist a few years back. And when bad times come, insular nationalism (both in the sense of xenophobia and autarky) poll well. The world-wide bad-times storm is getting super-charged right now, though I can't tell how much this is malice vs. incompetence from the White House.
- 7mo ago
- dijit 7mo ago[dead]
- AJRF 7mo agoLook to America to see what would happen to civil liberty in the pursuit of mass deportations. Discounting many things from the conversation - on the topic of this thread; Restore sounds like they'd be the single worst party to vote for if you were against mass surveillance.