3 ms·
How will it get rid of TURN? Can't IPv6 addresses still be firewalled by your carrier like they do already for IPv4?
by majorchord 7mo ago
How will it get rid of TURN? Can't IPv6 addresses still be firewalled by your carrier like they do already for IPv4?
- brewmarche 7mo agoI thought TURN was for symmetrical PAT, not for proper NAT (which just needs STUN for address determination) or full/restricted cone PATs (which need STUN for address and port determination, and then, in case of restricted cone, performs a hole punch). Standard-conforming IPv6 at most allows prefix translation (i.e., proper NAT, not PAT), which wouldn’t need it.