4 ms·
You could have government-signed models + programs that are approved for generating CP (not CSAM). It's legal if the signature checks out. Something like https:
by CaptainFever 7mo ago
You could have government-signed models + programs that are approved for generating CP (not CSAM). It's legal if the signature checks out. Something like https://contentauthenticity.org/ https://contentauthenticity.org/ but for verifying that something is definitely made by AI.
(You need to sign both the models and the programs to make sure there's no img2img.)
- _aavaa_ 7mo agoWe can't agree on weed or safe injection sites, you think we'll have government approved CP generation?
- PathfinderBot 7mo agoI totally agree, we should aim for all three harm reduction measures.
- _aavaa_ 7mo agoYeah? How? What strategy do you have for government funded and provided CP that is even remotely within the realm of political possibility?
- echoangle 7mo agoYou don’t even need to give them a model, just generate some images and publish them. If you find those images, it’s fine, if you find anything else, arrest them.
- PathfinderBot 7mo agoThat works too, though it'll of course result in a smaller selection and therefore smaller impact on the real market.
- lm28469 7mo agoThe level of tech solutionist brain rot you need to reach to propose state sponsored child porn generator... This forum is a parody of itself
- PathfinderBot 7mo agoSo no real arguments against it, only insults. That's great news, thank you! :)
- lm28469 7mo agoYou don't need scientific arguments for everything you know. What's your argument against consentent 10 year old siblings having sex together if they use protection? I don't have one but I know it's morally wrong and won't bring anything good