3 ms·
Should art not of a point of view?
by m-hodges 7mo ago
Should art not of a point of view?
- gzread 7mo agoSome is reasonable and then some is obviously just what rich people want you to think. Like America paid Hollywood a lot to always show the US armies being macho and always on the right side of wars.
- dmitrygr 7mo ago> Should art not of a point of view? It can, sure. However, I will not pay to be lectured to on topics I have no interest getting lectured on. I'll keep my money, they can keep the sermon. Let's see who has more to gain from listening to the other. If they want my money, what I want to hear/see matters a whole lot more than what they want to preach to me. They simply forgot the golden rule: he who has the gold -- makes the rules. Let them rediscover it.
- ludicrousdispla 7mo agoShould a sentence have a verb?
- m-hodges 7mo agoYou caught my typo. Gold medal.
- christophilus 7mo agoNot all sentences.
- nout 7mo agoAbsolutely!
- khazhoux 7mo agoNot always, no
- radiator 7mo agoThat is the whole point. Since decades, it has a single point of view, failing to represent the majority of the people.
- manphone 7mo agoAnd what point of view does all art have now?
- MagicMoonlight 7mo agoThat smugness is the exact point of view we’re talking about
- padjo 7mo agoI think you need to get out more if you really believe all movies have the one point of view
- alternatetwo 7mo agoI'm confused what you mean by "single point of view" and "the majority of the people". Please elaborate.
- jimbo808 7mo agoIt's your point of view.