5 ms·
I'm surprised nobody else has pointed this out. The entire YouTube video has only two short clips of the actual rocket being fired, and in both cases the clips
by daymanstep 7mo ago
I'm surprised nobody else has pointed this out. The entire YouTube video has only two short clips of the actual rocket being fired, and in both cases the clips are very short and only show the rocket being fired and then following an erratic flight path, and then get cut before showing the rocket hitting anything.
For all the technical info given in the video, there is a curious lack of any data regarding the actual accuracy of the system. What percentage of rockets tested managed to hit anything and at what range?
- __MatrixMan__ 7mo agoThe video references "future tracking systems," so I don't think it aims at all yet.
- walterbell 7mo ago> curious lack of any data regarding the actual accuracy of the system No lack of entrackment data generated by [edit] d̶i̶g̶i̶t̶a̶l̶ ̶t̶w̶i̶n̶ github repo of "the system".
- ImPostingOnHN 7mo ago"digital twin"? Is there a simulation that has been documented to have the identical behavior and flight characteristics as the real thing? Does not seem like it. If there is a difference, it is not a twin.
- walterbell 7mo agoThanks for the correction.
- simonh 7mo agoI suspect a major problem is the quality and consistency of the propellant and getting a symmetric burn.