The attitude suggested by "Heir of authority" [sic] is not compatible with those suggested by "defensive" and "emotional". I don't want to explicate a confused

The attitude suggested by "Heir of authority" [sic] is not compatible with those suggested by "defensive" and "emotional". I don't want to explicate a confused rant to show that it's confused, but: Unlike the evolutionists, though, economists don’t have a mini-community of people making youtube videos and evangelizing their points of view to the general public. Yes, there are economists who make youtube videos. Programmers love to talk about quantum physics, the speed of light, and black holes. But you won’t find geeks getting all authoritative on the finer points of the event horizon? Why? Economics is arguable because it is a soft science. We don't argue hard science because it's subject to controlled experiment. He's confusing apples and oranges. Every, single, person in the discussion is an expert. Except, of course, they aren’t. None of them are. Nope. Some of them are. He's confused "Some" with "None". ...blah blah. I'm picking up random sentences and they're all fucked up. If the point is to be funny, well, he failed at that as well.