3 ms·
So it loses pocket change for a multi billionaire? Edit: The consideration being that perhaps billionaire toys need not be profitable per se, but are purchased
by rapnie 7mo ago
So it loses pocket change for a multi billionaire?
Edit: The consideration being that perhaps billionaire toys need not be profitable per se, but are purchased for different reasons. Twitter is another example here.
- deleted 7mo ago[deleted]
- potro 7mo agoA $100m here, a $100m there, pretty soon, you're talking real money.
- cenamus 7mo agoYeah, he could only keep this going for another 2600 years
- bravetraveler 7mo agoY'all are talking about the real Scrooge McDuck.
- ZeroGravitas 7mo agoThat's assuming the pro-billionaire propaganda it produces doesn't make him many hundreds of millions more. In that light an arbitrary but vaguely plausible reason to fire anyone who insists on doing actual journalism and not billionaire propaganda is a useful tool.