4 ms·
To be clear, I don't agree with these laws and think they are very much the wrong way to try to solve the problem. But it is not a solved problem. From what I'
by thayne 7mo ago
To be clear, I don't agree with these laws and think they are very much the wrong way to try to solve the problem.
But it is not a solved problem. From what I've seen parental control software is generally pretty terrible. But this age verification stuff isn't really helpful.
- subscribed 7mo agoIt's a solved problem with a slightly flawed implementation on the end devices. You seem to be arguing that introducing the whole new class of legal frameworks, technical requirements and privacy scandals(1)(2) is somewhat better than fixing the end user software flaws. (1) https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/1-billion-identity-records-exposed-in-ai-verification-data-leak/ar-AA1YyJcM https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/1-billion-identity-rec... (2) https://proton.me/blog/discord-age-verfication-breach https://proton.me/blog/discord-age-verfication-breach
- thayne 7mo agoI am not arguing for that at all! I specifically said that I don't think age verification laws are a solution. But I also don't think it is a solved problem, and think that parents need better tools to help protect their children online.
- subscribed 7mo agoMy apologies then, this is what I understand. I agree with "parents need better tools", but at the same time by "solved problem" I meant technical measures deployed by the parents. Not the surveillance and privacy hell for adults.
- widowlark 7mo agothere is an exceptionally simple solve to the problem: Do not give your kids access to a cell phone or tablet.