7 ms·
Before edit: > You've started calling me names so I won't bother trying to engage any further. Thanks for the discussion. A note to future readers of this thr
by throw10920 7mo ago
Before edit:
> You've started calling me names so I won't bother trying to engage any further. Thanks for the discussion.
A note to future readers of this thread: observe the inconsistency between the poster's stated positions and decide whether you believe that their words are genuine (and their positions/advocacy are worth taking into consideration) in light of that.
- matheusmoreira 7mo agoResolving inconsistencies between my ideas is the entire reason why I come here to discuss them. I'm just not willing to do it while being accused of bad faith and of having no reading comprehension.
- throw10920 7mo agoFactually, you do either have bad reading comprehension or are operating in bad faith, because otherwise you could not have made this statement: > So if your so called authorities passed a law saying you're required to participate in some atrocity such as genocide, you'd do it with a clean conscience? Okay. No need to respond. This is just documentation for future HN readers.