3 ms·
> So yeah you're on a US platform americans don't think like europeans. I know lots of Americans, both online and in person, I see very little difference betwe
by jacquesm 8mo ago
> So yeah you're on a US platform americans don't think like europeans.
I know lots of Americans, both online and in person, I see very little difference between 'how Americans think' and 'how Europeans think'. What I did see is that you automatically assumed I was on the other side of you politicall, and that isn't the case, we are at least an ocean (and in many ways a world) apart and I figured you deserved a heads up so that at least you can calibrate your arguments. Besides that, I've lived on the other side of the US border for quite a long time and probably have more friends in the USA than I do in Europe.
> 1. Racism is Legal in US, disagree if you want but that's a core stance baked VERY deep into our system.
I don't care about racism (or, racist speech) being legal in the United States in the sense that I think it should not be legal anywhere, but I'm more upset at the fact that there are a number of outright racists active on HN who for some reason are not shut down. This bothers me at a very fundamental level because it's the Nazi bar problem: if you visit a bar and there are Nazi's there then you are visiting a Nazi bar. It risks guilt by association and I'm here under my real name.
HN has a serious problem that it refuses to acknowledge and this goes way beyond what is legal and what is not, it boils down to 'is this the kind of community that we want to create'. I think the best way to address that is - as you are finding out - to speak up against this as much as possible, though I have to admit it is getting more than a little tiring.
> 2. My point was literal free speech attacks justified or not happen.
That's true, but there are times when your right to 'free speech' can be temporarily trumped (I hate that word, but we're stuck with it) by the right of others to want to stay alive. This is perfectly fine and only the most ardent free speech absolutists will hold that there should be no limits at all (usually, they are also the first to apply for legal protection when those free speech rights are used against them, especially if they're wealthy and/or powerful). If you think free speech is so holy check out who are clamoring the loudest for it in the present and then study - as someone else in this thread already mentioned - Popper and see what he has to say about this. Everything in moderation, even absolutism is a good starting point.
> The intent to stop racism/xenophobia is moral but the mechanisms are bad.
No, the mechanisms are just the tools to not stop it but to stop its spread and as such the experts are the Germans. They have experienced first hand what it is like to have no holds on how far you are willing to let the freedom of speech go before you are on a path that will harm you for generations to come. It's possible that every geographic region has to learn this lesson on its own time, the problem is that we as humanity can not afford that luxury.
Racism, xenophobia, nazism: all of these are very bad things and if we all recognize that and realize that mental viruses spread through the same vectors as all of our other information that it is a good thing to combat them in the arena where they dominate and fester. Turning a blind eye and saying 'it is only speech' is the same as saying about Anthrax 'it's only a couple of molecules'. You can't outlaw molecules, but we definitely have ruled out the use and possession of Anthrax.
> If EU swings far right and the same tools to attack racism are flipped to attack liberal beliefs the EXACT argument you hold will be used against you.
No, they won't be. I believe there is a time to talk and that there is a time to act and that would be a time to stop talking.
> They will say: "lgbt is morally wrong and therefore any pro lgbt statements on social media are now an arrestable offense" without true free speech baked in that's possible.
I will be right there on the barriers, you can take that to the bank. I'm not the kind of person that just sits around and yaps, stuff gets done. And let's not pretend that the freedom of speech is how the LGBT community got their recognition in the first place, they were squelched everywhere possible and there are more than one States in the Union now where their rights are trampled left, right and center.
- junofan 8mo ago[flagged]
- jacquesm 8mo agoNo, you are rude, and you're wrong besides. Imagine: being ignorant and being proud of that ignorance at the same time. Also, when you think 'we' you should spell 'I'.
- thrance 8mo agoThis isn't rude, this is fucking insulting, and you know it. > Collectively you don’t speak your minds and do not defend those who dare to do so. Unlike Americans? Your democracy is in peril, not ours. Your press is under attack. Your free speech is threatened. Stop revelling in your ignorance and go do something about it. Or don't. Maybe the world's ready to move on from American hegemony.
- johnsmith1840 8mo ago[flagged]
- jacquesm 8mo ago> You are quite literally saying you are anti free speech while simultaneously complaining about trump infringing it. I did not 'quite literally' say anything like that. > You are directly calling for a small US platform to censor free speech when you are not even here? Sorry, but this is not a small US platform but a large global one and that pesky thing called 'free speech' that you're so hot about at least should give me the right to speak my mind about the limits to free speech because it is clear that HN is weaponized, and I don't want it to be. > You would protest I'm sure but if a far right controlled EU came to be the point is you'd be the minority and would be treated exactly like EU treats your far right groups now. The reason the EU treats those far right groups like that is to avoid a certain replay. I'm all for avoiding that. > You're arguing from a moral highground when I literally don't care. You're free to stop arguing, but as long as you argue you show you do care. > I am not much morally different than you I agree with almost all liberal beliefs. So, it's worth arguing about those little details that may make the difference between 'society survives' and 'society goes boom'. > I am saying I hope you and others like you never have the ability to perform the actions you call for in america. I don't have any power in America, other than the power of speech from the other side of the ocean, on a forum where I spent infinitely more time than you by now. And yes, I do care. > I view calls for censorship and stopping the spread of ideas as far more dangerous than the ideas themselves. Yes, there are many more like you. And that's fine. But there are also some that have read the occasional war diary (or two) and that realize that free speech can be weaponized just as easily as censorship and that both of these are wrong. It's just that as soon as you become dogmatic you lose objectivity, and the Germans have found out the hard way that some trees are best taken out before they grow roots. Whether they will be able to keep doing that forever remains to be seen but it should be a tell that the likes of Musk are aligned with the EU far right. And Musk is a lot more meddlesome in EU politics than I'll ever be in the states. > I will say in EU you may be largely right. If far right get in power they will crush liberal beliefs exactly as liberal crushed far right beliefs and all your fears will occur. And what makes you think the USA is immune? Doesn't the most recent decade show you that you are as much if not more in danger than Europe? > There would be your evil twin advocating all platforms to ban pro lgbt statements and getting laws in place to make it happen. I don't know why you keep bringing LGBT into this but this goes far beyond that. > Instead we should make laws to prevent you or your evil twin doing anything to the free flow of ideas. No worries, Bezos, Musk, Murdoch, Trump and a whole bunch of others that are way out of your control are doing just that, you don't need me for that. You'll have the illusion of the free flow of ideas but it will be nicely choreographed. > AKA: the first Amendment > This whole conversation makes me love america lol ...