3 ms·
"Should the government censor speech it doesn't like? Of course not. The FCC doesn't have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the \"public interest
by curt15 7mo ago
"Should the government censor speech it doesn't like? Of course not. The FCC doesn't have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the \"public interest\"." -- Brendan Carr 2019
- matthewdgreen 7mo agoSo much of the last four years was watching fools and dishonest people pretend that the government was coming to take away your free speech and you'd better elect [people who routinely lied about everything and clearly had no principles] to protect you.
- verdverm 7mo agoEvery accusation is an admission from the people running the united states right now
- helterskelter 7mo agoI think it's something they're doing consciously, accusing the opposition of doing what they're doing. It puts opposition on the back foot, muddies the water, and provides justification for doing something you shouldn't be since "the other side already did it". This us partly why politics has become like a Choose Your Own Adventure book (more than it was before anyway).
- throwaway173738 7mo agoWhich is why we need to watch the polls closely this year. They’ve repeatedly accused everyone of massive voter fraud so they will most certainly try it themselves.
- helterskelter 7mo agoSlight tangent but the thought has crossed my mind that (the potential of) retaliation by Iran could be a pretense for taking broad executive action which normally wouldn't be permitted, perhaps under the guise of securing the election. They may even do something which will be ruled illegal after the fact by courts, but it could take months after the election to reach a verdict and there's really no precedent in America for broadly declaring a federal election invalid. To be clear I don't really expect this to happen but at this point I honestly wouldn't even be surprised.
- throwaway173738 7mo agoI think they were hoping to provoke riots with ICE but since they didn’t happen they’re using Iran. If there’s a “terrorist” strike in November followed by a suspension of elections that’s likely what’s happening.
- toraway 7mo agoAccusation in a mirror, a strategy that is pretty much as you describe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusation_in_a_mirror https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accusation_in_a_mirror
- helterskelter 7mo agoThanks, I had not heard of this.
- verdverm 7mo agoRoy Cohn taught the man child well
- johnsmith1840 7mo ago[flagged]
- gtaylor 7mo agoThis “both sides” argument is so weak.
- throwaway173738 7mo agoYeah like if I’m in quicksand and asking to be helped out of it the appropriate response isn’t to say “the mud pit I’m sinking in is just as bad.” It’s to go get a rope.
- icehawk 7mo agoI live in the present, and not the past, so I'm not sure what your argument is here.
- adrr 7mo agoSame party thats says they are against new wars.