3 ms·
> Actual evidence of kompromats? Epstein.
by indymike 7mo ago
> Actual evidence of kompromats?
Epstein.
- PaulDavisThe1st 7mo agoI'm not following the file disclosures in particular detail; I haven't yet heard any disclosures from the files that are evidence of kompromat. What are you thinking of?
- asdff 7mo agohttps://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/12/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-emails-house-democrats.html https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/12/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghisla...
- PaulDavisThe1st 7mo agoOK, so hearsay from Epstein. Which could easily be reliable. And could also not be. Also unclear precisely what "dirty" means. So sure, it adds to the pile, but we're not there yet, IMO.
- asdff 7mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct...
- PaulDavisThe1st 7mo agoNotice how this information is a publically accessible web server? This is quite unusual definition of "kompromat". Look, when it comes to Trump, at this point, there likely is no "kompromat" that would affect him. He could have raped and murdered a 5 year old at the behest of Russian intelligence services, and his MAGA base would defend it as somehow part of God's grand plan for the republic. What is there that could be revealed about him at this point that would actually change anything? The man was found guilty of sexual assault, recorded boasting about sexually assaulting women, found guilty of real estate fraud .. and re-elected. Maybe you can imagine some sort of of "kompromat" that would actually impact him in a way that diminished his power, but I cannot.
- asdff 7mo agoEpstein was notorious for having compromising photos and videos of just about everyone who did anything compromising in his periphery. Are we shocked that Trumps own DOJ has not revealed a smoking gun? Do we forget that his name has been redacted by his own DOJ?