5 ms·
The question is, as MOOCs continue to grow in popularity and the "graduates" of these courses inevitably enter jobs that use these new skills, will the "certifi
by breckinloggins 14y ago
The question is, as MOOCs continue to grow in popularity and the "graduates" of these courses inevitably enter jobs that use these new skills, will the "certificates" that these places offer come to have their own currency?
In other words, will there come a time when a "degree" from Coursera showing proficiency in a relevant topic become more valuable than an actual degree from an accredited four-year institution?
I think that this will happen. Slowly, but it will happen. Software companies will probably lead the way on this. If I were hiring someone for a developer position, I have to ask my self which I would rather see:
- An online portfolio complete with GitHub resume of open source samples, blog posts demonstrating writing skills and competence, and a collection of certificates from Udacity, mitX, and Coursera.
OR...
- A degree from State Tech with transcripts showing an A in Data Structures, a B in databases, and an A in Operating Systems
Obviously there won't be such a clean divide between the two for a long time, but it's always been my belief that software development especially (and engineering in general) are better served by a master-apprentice approach than a four year "liberal arts" approach. Seen this way, the rise in "online credentials" is most valuable as a way of selecting those who would most benefit from the intense time and money investment of a master of their field.
As for general education, I do think it would be a shame to throw the baby out with the bathwater and end up with an entire generation of people who are really good at machine learning but never took a higher-level history course. So I'm thinking a good hybrid would be a two-year associates degree that covers the basics followed by self study online using MOOCs (perhaps combined with some kind of enlightened one or two year "work-study" program offered by companies like Google).
I'm really just thinking out loud here, so this isn't some kind of formal proposal or argument. I'm just wondering what the most optimal "end game" is.
- foobarqux 14y agoMost of the courses are, at least currently, not the quality of those served by a good conventional institution. Moreover the multiple-choice and/or keep-trying grading format makes assessment, even self-assessment, challenging.
- mkolodny 14y agoFrom the article: > And in a vote of confidence in the form, students in both [of two Coursera courses] overwhelmingly endorsed the quality of the course: 63 percent who completed Dr. Agarwal’s course as well as a similar one on campus found the MOOC better; 36 percent found it comparable; 1 percent, worse. I'd say that the quality of MOOCs vary, but definitely no more than the quality of courses at a formal institution.
- codeonfire 14y agoReally, people who spend their time, received some notion of credit for completing a class, and then praise it for quality represent the textbook case of biased opinion.
- foobarqux 14y agoEven more so if the course was easy and they received a good grade.
- dubya 14y agoThis is generally true. I think I learned a lot in the Scala course, but it would be nice to have a human look at the code at some point. And the assignments were more or less fill-in-the-blank. OTOH, this language course http://spanishmooc.com/ http://spanishmooc.com/ looks potentially as good or better than traditional ones. It seems like language courses over the Internet with native speakers could be higher quality and competitively priced with software solutions.