3 ms·

>> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4737400 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4737400 That's the second time you post an almost identical comment in a thr

by tisme 14y ago

>> http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4737400 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4737400 That's the second time you post an almost identical comment in a thread about people not buying apple products due to their behaviour and you're telling them they are not truthful. What reason would someone have to say anything whatsoever about a decision they've made? It's not as if they have Samsung stock or are shorting Apple. They are simple statements of fact. If someone states something about themselves then your best bet is to believe they know better than you what made them decide.

shinratdr 14y ago
> That's the second time you post an almost identical comment in a thread about people not buying apple products due to their behaviour and you're telling them they are not truthful. Actually I was arguing that they aren't buying Apple products because of this particular incident, not their overall behaviour. That I buy, it's a small segment of the population but it does exist. However I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident. It's a ridiculous prospect, and indicative of a consumer that has no real preferences about the device they buy, they're just running purely on spite. GP basically just came right out and said that. > If someone states something about themselves then your best bet is to believe they know better than you what made them decide. I'm not allowed to apply critical thinking skills to statements others make about themselves? That's pretty ridiculous. And since when did I argue against that? I'm sure he does know his motivations better than I. That doesn't mean for a second that he's being honest with us or himself about those motivations.
- tisme 14y ago
  > However I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident. It's a ridiculous prospect, and indicative of a consumer that has no real preferences about the device they buy, they're just running purely on spite. People make decisions based on many factors: - price - utility - brand loyalty / brand image I have several Apple devices in my household, until they better their ways on the legal front there will not be another. In my case that meant that I bought one device from an Apple competitor, and held off on another purchase because I can't find something that suits my needs that does not have an Apple logo on it. You can apply your critical thinking skills to statements of facts where you are in possession of the facts. In this case you are essentially calling people liars when you are not in a position to know their minds or circumstances and where you don't have all the relevant facts. Giving people the benefit of the doubt when it comes to them stating their reasons for acting or not acting in some particular case is typically a decent thing to do, even if you personally would not behave in that way. So, the OP is likely honest with you and all those visiting here about their motivations, as am I. And we do employ our critical thinking skills in evaluating where our next purchases are being made.
- FSEA 14y ago
  "I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident." Why? One of the world's largest corporations acted like a snotty brat in a court mandated statement. Dedicated most of it's space to show it's entire public facing self is entirely disconnected with the court's wishes, and a good portion of the world. Why would I support them in this by buying their goods?

by tisme 14y ago

shinratdr 14y ago

> That's the second time you post an almost identical comment in a thread about people not buying apple products due to their behaviour and you're telling them they are not truthful. Actually I was arguing that they aren't buying Apple products because of this particular incident, not their overall behaviour. That I buy, it's a small segment of the population but it does exist. However I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident. It's a ridiculous prospect, and indicative of a consumer that has no real preferences about the device they buy, they're just running purely on spite. GP basically just came right out and said that. > If someone states something about themselves then your best bet is to believe they know better than you what made them decide. I'm not allowed to apply critical thinking skills to statements others make about themselves? That's pretty ridiculous. And since when did I argue against that? I'm sure he does know his motivations better than I. That doesn't mean for a second that he's being honest with us or himself about those motivations.

tisme 14y ago
> However I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident. It's a ridiculous prospect, and indicative of a consumer that has no real preferences about the device they buy, they're just running purely on spite. People make decisions based on many factors: - price - utility - brand loyalty / brand image I have several Apple devices in my household, until they better their ways on the legal front there will not be another. In my case that meant that I bought one device from an Apple competitor, and held off on another purchase because I can't find something that suits my needs that does not have an Apple logo on it. You can apply your critical thinking skills to statements of facts where you are in possession of the facts. In this case you are essentially calling people liars when you are not in a position to know their minds or circumstances and where you don't have all the relevant facts. Giving people the benefit of the doubt when it comes to them stating their reasons for acting or not acting in some particular case is typically a decent thing to do, even if you personally would not behave in that way. So, the OP is likely honest with you and all those visiting here about their motivations, as am I. And we do employ our critical thinking skills in evaluating where our next purchases are being made.
FSEA 14y ago
"I'm seriously skeptical that anyone would actually choose an Android tablet instead of an iPad because of this particular incident." Why? One of the world's largest corporations acted like a snotty brat in a court mandated statement. Dedicated most of it's space to show it's entire public facing self is entirely disconnected with the court's wishes, and a good portion of the world. Why would I support them in this by buying their goods?