2 ms·
There’s a lot of articles about it. It costs them $500+ for heavy users. They do this to capture market share and also to train their agent loops with human rei
by nemo44x 7mo ago
There’s a lot of articles about it. It costs them $500+ for heavy users. They do this to capture market share and also to train their agent loops with human reinforcement learning.
https://ezzekielnjuguna.medium.com/why-anthropic-is-practically-giving-claude-code-away-and-how-youre-accidentally-ruining-it-for-1fceb2efa0e5 https://ezzekielnjuguna.medium.com/why-anthropic-is-practica...
- gruez 7mo ago>There’s a lot of articles about it. .... >https://ezzekielnjuguna.medium.com/why-anthropic-is-practica https://ezzekielnjuguna.medium.com/why-anthropic-is-practica... You chose a bad one. It just asserts the 95% figure without evidence and then uses it as the premise for the rest of the article. That just confirms what I said earlier about how "Every time I see claims on profitability it's always hand wavy justifications.". Moreover the article reeks of LLM-isms.