7 ms·
The word "content" is gross. "Creator", on the other hand, is beautiful. It means you don't have to pick a lane. Anything can be creative. Documentary filmmaki
by echelon 8mo ago
The word "content" is gross.
"Creator", on the other hand, is beautiful. It means you don't have to pick a lane. Anything can be creative. Documentary filmmaking, stop motion, dance, costume work, historical reenactment, indie animation, economics essays, game dev...
The problem is we don't have a nice word that holistically captures the output of creators. They're not all making films or illustrations. So what do you call it? "Art" is awkward.
"Content" works, but it sounds like slop. We need a better alternative word that elevates creative output.
- gzread 8mo agoSince it's OnlyFans, I'd think something like "porn stars" or "online girlfriends" If it were YouTube, "YouTuber" is a start, but you could also be a "YouTube science communicator" or something
- echelon 8mo agoCreator is a fine word to use in place of YouTuber. And vice versa. But what do you call their output? What do you call an illustrator's output? A photographer? What about when all of that shows up on your feed collectively? Content is a gross word.
- gzread 8mo agoYou can call it video essays, Let's Plays, news reports, slop videos, and so on. To repeat fgiesen/ryg: to a content plumber, it's all content, just like the mail system delivers packages and doesn't really care what's in them. The video engineers at YouTube don't care whether it's a news report or a slop video, as long as the frames get on your screen. However the sender and receiver had better care what's in the package or something's gone horribly wrong.
- majicDave 8mo agoCreations?