This is a "productionisation" of the same content discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528 I

This is a "productionisation" of the same content discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47362528 I would caution readers to do their due dilligence as the presentation may be fancy but that should not immediately translate into a signal of quality in itself given the author has disclosed using Claude Code for a chunk of this work. While I won't outright discount the findings (as there is "too much" to reasonably verify), there are a few oddities around the source repo such as errors where Claude has tried to access sources, been denied and then noted as much or where it has seemingly fetched incorrect files and tried to interpret them (https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings/blob/main/output/reports/anomaly_report.md#c3-la-hb-570-is-the-wrong-bill https://github.com/upper-up/meta-lobbying-and-other-findings...) I am not under the immediate impression that the author has done thorough due diligence rather than just offloading that to readers by saying "You can just check the sources yourself"