3 ms·

From your own link: "But the consortium, looking at a broader group of rejected ballots than those covered in the court decisions, 175,010 in all, found that M

• dctoedt 14y ago
  > So I am right. Absolutely --- if by "Gore won" you mean that Gore might have pulled ahead, by around 115 votes, and been declared the winner, if all of the following had occurred: (i) Gore had asked the courts for a full statewide recount, instead of the more-limited recount that he did ask for; * and (ii) the courts had found sufficient cause to order such an expansive (and expensive) recount, instead of limiting the recount to specific areas where good reason had been affirmatively demonstrated; AND (iii) in such a statewide recount, the various voting officials in Florida's 67 counties had (x) tagged the same specific 175,010 ballots as problematic as did the news organizations' independent observers, and then (y) reached the same conclusions about those ballots as did the independent observers. * * As explained in the Times article We can never know whether (ii) and, especially, (iii) would have occurred.
• jmaygarden 14y ago
  If you want to see real election fraud, then look no further than Chicago in 1960 [1]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1960#Controversies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_elec...