4 ms·
We know what he meant, and he's being obtuse. Thinks thousands of deaths due to rampant crime somehow aren't or shouldn't be part of the discussion when the co
by mikkupikku 8mo ago
We know what he meant, and he's being obtuse. Thinks thousands of deaths due to rampant crime somehow aren't or shouldn't be part of the discussion when the collateral cost of law enforcement efforts are discussed. Very dumb.
- croes 8mo agoThat where only the collaterals of the drone strikes. More people are killed with at least 17% innocent civilians
- havenbarnes 8mo agoI figured my wording was clearly sarcastic but I should’ve added a “/s”. Extrajudicial slaughtering is not something I’d support regardless of civilian casualty rate.
- ghurtado 8mo agoSpamming the same comment over and over again, what a sad existence. Flagged. Honestly, you do not belong in this platform. You have the maturity of a 3rd grader.
- AnimalMuppet 8mo agoPersonal attacks also do not belong on this platform. Regardless of what you think of the GP's comments, don't reply like this.
- jibal 8mo agoNeither mikkupikku nor ghurtado seem to care.