4 ms·

Overall I agree with the approach, but just wondering, why do the first point if you are already doing the last two? > * Use the issue id at the start of every

by mb7733 7mo ago

Overall I agree with the approach, but just wondering, why do the first point if you are already doing the last two? > * Use the issue id at the start of every commit message for that issue > * Use a single branch per issue, whose name also starts with the issue id >* Use a single PR to merge that branch and close the issue To me the noise at the start of every message is unnecessary, and given a lot of interfaces only display 80 chars of the message by default, it's not negligible.

hammadfauz 7mo ago
If the pattern is consistent, it gets easier to ignore the noise when you don't need it. Like, a three/four digit number or a 3 letters and 3 numbers separated by a hyphen. Sometimes, an issue might depend on another issue and contain commits from the other branch. Tagging each commit makes it easier to pinpoint the exact reason for that change.