3 ms·
This is a very one-sided article, unashamedly so. Where's the references to the decline in quality and embarrassing outages for Amazon, Microsoft, etc?
by lelanthran 8mo ago
This is a very one-sided article, unashamedly so.
Where's the references to the decline in quality and embarrassing outages for Amazon, Microsoft, etc?
- dboreham 8mo agoEverything you read is in service of someone's business model.
- gnz11 8mo agoWhat’s your point? Journalists have jobs?
- 0xcafefood 8mo agoNYT doesn't like digital advertisers and the programmers who make that possible. They're directly in competition.
- negromcnig 8mo agojournalists are like our own simon willinson: they need to put food on their plate by networking with powerful entities that fly them out to conferences
- esafak 8mo agoDo we know that it decreased the quality, or introduced more opportunities for bugs by simply increasing the velocity? If every commit has a fixed probability of having a bug, you'll run into more bugs in a week by going faster.
- pydry 8mo agoDo we know it increased the velocity and didnt just churn more slop? Even before AI the limiting factor on all of the teams I ever worked on was bad decisions, not how much time it took to write code. There seem to be more of those these days.
- lelanthran 8mo ago> Do we know that it decreased the quality, or introduced more opportunities for bugs by simply increasing the velocity? That's an easy question to answer - you can look at outages per feature released. You may be instead looking at outages per loc written.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- leptons 8mo agoAI is constantly trying to introduce bugs into my code. I've started disabling it when I know exactly where I'm going with the code, because the AI is often a lot more confused than I am about where the code is going.