> Nobody is going to stop using grammarly extensions to post to HN, nobody is going to be able to detect its usage. I do not think the new rules or for this us

> Nobody is going to stop using grammarly extensions to post to HN, nobody is going to be able to detect its usage. I do not think the new rules or for this use case or at least not target at them. None of the examples I looked at from Dang's post https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342616 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47342616 look like gramarly edits that are hard to notice. > This thread just lets a certain kind of people put on their best condescending hall-monitor voice and lecture other people about how they should behave. I think it is, at least mostly, about the blatant cases that are often already down voted and flag and make it official. > And the rule is arguably less useful than speed limits and will be broken about as often (at least speed limits have a very real link to physical safety via kinetic energy). I often see the rules in: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html broken, mostly small ways, I still think we are better off with them or something similar rather than having nothing.