4 ms·

Random sampling makes a lot of intuitive sense, but unfortunately doesn't work well. I just answered over at lobsters: https://lobste.rs/s/t43mh5/okmain_you_hav

Random sampling makes a lot of intuitive sense, but unfortunately doesn't work well. I just answered over at lobsters: https://lobste.rs/s/t43mh5/okmain_you_have_image_you_want_colour#c_he3k1t https://lobste.rs/s/t43mh5/okmain_you_have_image_you_want_co... I should probably add this nuance to the post itself. Edit: added a footnote

SigmundurM 7mo ago
How about sampling more from the more "prominent" areas of the image[0] and less from less "prominent" areas? [0]: https://dgroshev.com/blog/okmain/img/distance_mask.png?hash=a921b80a https://dgroshev.com/blog/okmain/img/distance_mask.png?hash=...