3 ms·
Because writing Rust backend is needlessly complex for majority of projects.
by omnimus 7mo ago
Because writing Rust backend is needlessly complex for majority of projects.
- potwinkle 7mo agoI've had a great time using Rust with Actix as the framework.
- pjmlp 7mo agoStill easier than dealing with node dependencies, webpack and co, they make me wish to write ASP with OCX components instead.
- drawfloat 7mo agoYour complaint is with Vite – famously incredibly simple and reliable to work with – using Rust, but you're bringing up webpack's complexity? Node dependencies are fine, add an npmrc file to have it default to exact versioning and you solve 90% of common day to day problems. It's not ideal, but nor is cargo's mystery meat approach to importing optional features from packages.
- pjmlp 7mo agoMy remark, and not complaint, is that the fashion to rewrite everything in Rust across the JavaScript ecosystem proves the point of holding it wrong. Maybe leave JavaScript on the browser, where it belongs.
- maccard 7mo agoThere’s a middle ground between node and rust. Dotnet and Java are wildly productive places to work but they’re not as exciting as rust. Also, writing JavaScript for the backend is needlessly underperforming for anything with any load.