4 ms·
Yes, those work fine: https://playground.oxc.rs/?options=%7B%22run%22%3A%7B%22lint%22%3Afalse%2C%22formatter%22%3Afalse%2C%22transform%22%3Atrue%2C%22isolatedDe
by ameliaquining 8mo ago
Yes, those work fine: https://playground.oxc.rs/?options=%7B%22run%22%3A%7B%22lint%22%3Afalse%2C%22formatter%22%3Afalse%2C%22transform%22%3Atrue%2C%22isolatedDeclarations%22%3Afalse%2C%22whitespace%22%3Afalse%2C%22mangle%22%3Afalse%2C%22compress%22%3Afalse%2C%22scope%22%3Atrue%2C%22symbol%22%3Atrue%2C%22cfg%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22parser%22%3A%7B%22extension%22%3A%22ts%22%2C%22allowReturnOutsideFunction%22%3Atrue%2C%22preserveParens%22%3Atrue%2C%22allowV8Intrinsics%22%3Atrue%2C%22semanticErrors%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22linter%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22formatter%22%3A%7B%22useTabs%22%3Afalse%2C%22tabWidth%22%3A2%2C%22endOfLine%22%3A%22lf%22%2C%22printWidth%22%3A80%2C%22singleQuote%22%3Afalse%2C%22jsxSingleQuote%22%3Afalse%2C%22quoteProps%22%3A%22as-needed%22%2C%22trailingComma%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22semi%22%3Atrue%2C%22arrowParens%22%3A%22always%22%2C%22bracketSpacing%22%3Atrue%2C%22bracketSameLine%22%3Afalse%2C%22objectWrap%22%3A%22preserve%22%2C%22singleAttributePerLine%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22transformer%22%3A%7B%22target%22%3A%22es2015%22%2C%22useDefineForClassFields%22%3Atrue%2C%22experimentalDecorators%22%3Atrue%2C%22emitDecoratorMetadata%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22isolatedDeclarations%22%3A%7B%22stripInternal%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22codegen%22%3A%7B%22normal%22%3Atrue%2C%22jsdoc%22%3Atrue%2C%22annotation%22%3Atrue%2C%22legal%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22compress%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22mangle%22%3A%7B%22topLevel%22%3Atrue%2C%22keepNames%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22controlFlow%22%3A%7B%22verbose%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22inject%22%3A%7B%22inject%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%2C%22define%22%3A%7B%22define%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D&code=class+A+%7B%0A++constructor%28public+b%3A+number%29+%7B%7D%0A%7D%0A%0Aenum+C+%7B%0A++D%2C%0A++E%2C%0A%7D%0A https://playground.oxc.rs/?options=%7B%22run%22%3A%7B%22lint...
For that matter, TypeScript's version of decorators ("experimental decorators") also works: https://playground.oxc.rs/?options=%7B%22run%22%3A%7B%22lint%22%3Afalse%2C%22formatter%22%3Afalse%2C%22transform%22%3Atrue%2C%22isolatedDeclarations%22%3Afalse%2C%22whitespace%22%3Afalse%2C%22mangle%22%3Afalse%2C%22compress%22%3Afalse%2C%22scope%22%3Atrue%2C%22symbol%22%3Atrue%2C%22cfg%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22parser%22%3A%7B%22extension%22%3A%22ts%22%2C%22allowReturnOutsideFunction%22%3Atrue%2C%22preserveParens%22%3Atrue%2C%22allowV8Intrinsics%22%3Atrue%2C%22semanticErrors%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22linter%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22formatter%22%3A%7B%22useTabs%22%3Afalse%2C%22tabWidth%22%3A2%2C%22endOfLine%22%3A%22lf%22%2C%22printWidth%22%3A80%2C%22singleQuote%22%3Afalse%2C%22jsxSingleQuote%22%3Afalse%2C%22quoteProps%22%3A%22as-needed%22%2C%22trailingComma%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22semi%22%3Atrue%2C%22arrowParens%22%3A%22always%22%2C%22bracketSpacing%22%3Atrue%2C%22bracketSameLine%22%3Afalse%2C%22objectWrap%22%3A%22preserve%22%2C%22singleAttributePerLine%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22transformer%22%3A%7B%22target%22%3A%22es2015%22%2C%22useDefineForClassFields%22%3Atrue%2C%22experimentalDecorators%22%3Atrue%2C%22emitDecoratorMetadata%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22isolatedDeclarations%22%3A%7B%22stripInternal%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22codegen%22%3A%7B%22normal%22%3Atrue%2C%22jsdoc%22%3Atrue%2C%22annotation%22%3Atrue%2C%22legal%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22compress%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22mangle%22%3A%7B%22topLevel%22%3Atrue%2C%22keepNames%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22controlFlow%22%3A%7B%22verbose%22%3Afalse%7D%2C%22inject%22%3A%7B%22inject%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%2C%22define%22%3A%7B%22define%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D&code=function+sealed%28constructor%3A+Function%29+%7B%0A++Object.seal%28constructor%29%3B%0A++Object.seal%28constructor.prototype%29%3B%0A%7D%0A%0A%40sealed%0Aexport+class+A+%7B%7D%0A https://playground.oxc.rs/?options=%7B%22run%22%3A%7B%22lint...
What's not supported is the current draft proposal for standardized ECMAScript decorators; if you uncheck experimentalDecorators, the decorator syntax is simply passed through as-is, even when lowering to ES2015.
- slopinthebag 8mo agoAwesome. Standard decorators support is not a dealbreaker for me, but enums and other types of non-erasable syntax would be. Do you know what the status is on using Rolldown as a crate for rust usage? At the moment most rust projects use SWC but afaik its bundler is depreciated. I usually just call into Deno for builds but would be nice to have it all purely in Rust.
- Benjamin_Dobell 8mo agoTC39 decorators emit just landed in tsgo about 24 hours ago. Hopefully they're available in Vite 8 soon. I'm using them in GodotJS https://github.com/godotjs/GodotJS/commit/a4bafef9f14c103b0972d167c722b0924c221d82 https://github.com/godotjs/GodotJS/commit/a4bafef9f14c103b09...
- krona 8mo agoIt doesn't support const enum, unlike esbuild which supports them well enough to be credible. https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/issues/6073 https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/issues/6073