4 ms·
Don’t use the “auto” model and you will be fine. You just described their “auto” behavior, which I’m guessing uses grok. Using it with specific models is grea
by sroussey 8mo ago
Don’t use the “auto” model and you will be fine.
You just described their “auto” behavior, which I’m guessing uses grok.
Using it with specific models is great, though you can tell that Anthropic is subsidizing Claude Code as you watch your API costs more directly. Some day the subsidy will end. Enjoy it now!
And cursor debugging is 10x better, oh my god.
I have switched to 70% Claude Code, 10% Copilot code reviews (non anthropic model), and 20% Cursor and switch the models a bit (sometimes have them compete — get four to implement the same thing at the same time, then review their choices, maybe choose one, or just get a better idea of what to ask for and try again).
- jurgenburgen 8mo ago> get four to implement the same thing at the same time, then review their choices Why would you do that to yourself? Reviewing 4 different solutions instead of 1 is 4 times the amount of work.
- maleldil 7mo agoYou wouldn't do that for everything. I'd reserve it for work with higher uncertainty, where you're not sure which path is best. Different model families can make very different choices.
- sroussey 7mo agoYes, this exactly. Also, if there is a ui design then they could look wildly different. I rarely use this feature, but when appropriate, it is fantastic to see the different approaches.