4 ms·
I'm the manager. They do not send that message. They either are trying and never giving up, or... doing dishes. I check in, and it ends up being story time abo
by butILoveLife 7mo ago
I'm the manager. They do not send that message. They either are trying and never giving up, or... doing dishes.
I check in, and it ends up being story time about non-issues.
In person, its a 'hows it going?' and they say either 'good, still working' or 'stuck...'.
I would love if WFH was as effective. I could reduce my labor costs and probably have happier workers.
- conception 7mo agoConsidering it’s very easy to send a how’s it going Slack message or whatever this seems more like a issue of keeping the conversation on task than a slack issue
- dg08 7mo agoYou're getting a lot of replies from other ICs that do well in a WFH setting, but I can say from a manager perspective, it's not always the manager or process. I've been managing remote teams for years since before covid and some people just don't do well without the in-person structure. It's possible to build a high performing remote team, but it's not easy.
- ytoawwhra92 7mo ago> some people just don't do well without the in-person structure Structure is what makes remote work well. IME places that rely on everyone being together in-person to make sure things get done have poorly-defined structure.
- hephaes7us 7mo agoYou could reduce your labor costs and reduce the aggravation you are causing teammates if you changed your attitude. It's possible to drive results and create a culture of accountability without dragging people into the room with you just so you can interrupt their work in-person.