3 ms·
Downloading a picture needs to happen to show it. Without it it cannot be shown. I'm sure courts figured out that viewing a picture via browser is not infringin
by throwaway290 7mo ago
Downloading a picture needs to happen to show it. Without it it cannot be shown. I'm sure courts figured out that viewing a picture via browser is not infringing.
- matheusmoreira 7mo agoYou forgot the "save it to my machine" part which lets me view the picture whenever I want without visiting its creator's website repeatedly. This means I don't need to be exposed to ads, which in turn lowers the creator's income. It also means other people can get the picture from me rather from the creator. Even less ads and payments. Obviously the creators want more money and control. Thus copies are only allowed to be made if it benefits them. Viewing a copy of the picture via the website might be permitted, but saving it or sharing it might not. The truth is nobody really cares what creators want. People will save and share and edit and meme it all up because they can. It is natural. It is their delusional belief that they can control what others do with information that is out of touch with reality.
- throwaway290 7mo agoI'm talking downloading that needs to happen to show the picture you said > You infringe copyright every time you download a picture off of a website no, browser downloads a copy of the picture in order to show it and it is fine by courts that's why I'm saying you don't know what you're talking about > This means I don't need to be exposed to ads, which in turn lowers the creator's income duh.