3 ms·
There are so many errors in this headline: * Britain has not had a parliament for seven hundred years. The current parliament dates back to 1707 or 1801 depend
by nephihaha 8mo ago
There are so many errors in this headline:
* Britain has not had a parliament for seven hundred years. The current parliament dates back to 1707 or 1801 depending on your POV. This is the usual conflation of England with Britain.
* If you want to take a more Anglocentric viewpoint then Oliver Cromwell ejected hereditary nobles back in the 18th century. So not the first time.
On a different note, it is worth saying that hereditary peers are often more independent. They are born into the role so hold their own viewpoints. Some of them were and are to the left of recent British governments, even though that may be hard to believe. The current Labour government wishes to replace them with appointees so that the entire House of Lords will become another party political machine.
- Lio 8mo ago> There are so many errors in this headline: > If you want to take a more Anglocentric viewpoint then Oliver Cromwell ejected hereditary nobles back in the 18th century. So not the first time. Which was a neat trick considering he died in 1658... :P
- nephihaha 8mo agoCorrect and my typo. But the point stands. The House of Lords has not been running for as long as the article claims. A substantial break during the Commonwealth.