4 ms·

Interesting that the don't article has multiple citations whereas the do article has none. The article itself dates to pre-economic crash times, as it came out

• kirse 18y ago
  Good point, that is pretty interesting how the career woman who wrote the article made her case from an emotional appeal (her story wrapped up with this): So, guys, if you're game for an exciting life, go ahead and marry a professional gal. While the career man made his case primarily from an evidentiary standpoint. It doesn't invalidate either argument, but it certainly reinforces the differences in thinking between men and women. In my experience, convincing people begins with good evidence and mixes in an emotional appeal - the evidence forms the basis for a good intuitive feeling that helps to win people over.
  • dominik 18y ago
    I saw that as well, though I wouldn't generalize so far as the differences in how men and women think just from a pair of articles. Also, an exciting life is not necessarily a pleasant one...