3 ms·
I don't use WASM as a replacement for JS. I never have a need to manipulate DOM, etc from WASM. JS is perfectly fine and performant for those purposes. As I se
by GianFabien 7mo ago
I don't use WASM as a replacement for JS. I never have a need to manipulate DOM, etc from WASM. JS is perfectly fine and performant for those purposes.
As I see it, WASM is used to augment the JS/WebAPI ecosystem. For example, when you need to do heavy bit manipulation, complex numerical processing. The round-trip JS->WASM->JS is an overhead. So the WASM modules should perform a substantial amount of processing to offset that inefficiency.
I frequently find that V8 optimisations yield sufficient performance without needing to delve into WASM.
IMHO if you want to write WebApps in Rust, you're holding it wrong.
- thezipcreator 7mo agoI disagree. That's how WASM is now, and I guess that's fine, but that's not all it could be. I really think it would be awesome if you could write code for the web in your preferred programming language.