3 ms·

So the administration lied and Iran‘s nuclear capabilities weren’t “completely obliterated” back in June, and saying otherwise isn’t “fake news”? It can’t be b

So the administration lied and Iran‘s nuclear capabilities weren’t “completely obliterated” back in June, and saying otherwise isn’t “fake news”? It can’t be both ways. Either way the administration is lying, so I just don’t trust any of the reasons given for the current conflict. The sad part is this is exactly what Trump and his administration, as well as the larger Republican Party, have wanted for years. My inherent distrust of every government action until I see overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

joe_mamba 8mo ago
>It can’t be both ways. It can be over time. A country can rebuild its nuclear ambitions after they've been completely destroyed. Do you think Iran just gave up their nuclear ambition and 40 years of work after a bomb raid? "Think Mark, think"
- Forgeties79 8mo ago
  >Think Mark, think Needlessly patronizing. But moving past that, how could their capabilities have been “completely obliterated” months ago and yet they are now so close to making a bomb that it warranted all this? That doesn’t make any sense. Just like the tariffs or any other controversial decision, the administration is giving different answers to different people at different times. They seed talking points, they do not provide useful information. So again, either June was a failure and they lied or they are lying about this attack.