3 ms·
The two deals you mention are not at all comparable. Ukraine's deal was vague promises with vague consequences, which of course materialized into zero ability
by SimianSci 7mo ago
The two deals you mention are not at all comparable.
Ukraine's deal was vague promises with vague consequences, which of course materialized into zero ability to stop a land invasion.
The Iranian deal before its destruction was very much concerned with safeguarding against any attempt to "potentially circumvent" and gave auditors alot of freedom to investigate without obstruction.
Your partisan posting in regards to the notion of the war being pointless indicate that you're coming more from a place of emotion than logic. I can empathize, but strongly caution that its important we discuss the facts of arguments rather than gesturing that all but you fail to see the light.
- joe_mamba 7mo ago>The two deals you mention are not at all comparable That's reddit logic. Do you think invading armies or dictatorship seeking to build nukes to preserve their power, care about the semantics of deals?
- nozzlegear 7mo agoThat is some Reddit logic. It is the very semantics of the deals that keep those armies from invading in the first place. Of course they care about them.