3 ms·
According to those reports, the US military tested it for more than a year on animals, and found that they suffered similar patterns of brain damage. They didn'
by matthewdgreen 7mo ago
According to those reports, the US military tested it for more than a year on animals, and found that they suffered similar patterns of brain damage. They didn't just get a device and say "wow, this looks like a bunch of very suspicious electronics, too bad we can't turn it on!"
Naturally the testing claims from insiders could be specious. But once you go down the road of distrusting stories told by spooks, so could the purchase of a weapon in the first place. The CIA might not even be a real thing.
- vintermann 7mo agoNo, I'm sure they tested it, and I'm sure they found "similar patterns". I'm also quite sure that the kind of person who would say "come on guys, this is just a RF noise machine, if they had used this in Havana we would have known ages ago" would not be trusted to work on such an important and serious investigation. I'm not positing any more dysfunction than I see on the outside all the time. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former PM of Norway, doctor, and one time head of the WHO, was convinced she had RF-hypersensitivity. One of my mantras is that powerful people believe all the stupid things regular people believe, they just tend to act differently on their beliefs.
- matthewdgreen 7mo agoThese are not subtle effects. You either have an energy weapon that does visible damage to people and things, or it doesn't. Yes, incompetence is possible. You should not jump to "I mistake a candle for a burning skyscraper" levels of incompetence as your main model for a project that lasts a year and is extremely high-priority.