2 ms·
Sure. And the weak evidence still isn't powerful, because so much effort had to be expended to gain it. If cheating were widespread it would have been detected
by jfengel 8mo ago
Sure. And the weak evidence still isn't powerful, because so much effort had to be expended to gain it. If cheating were widespread it would have been detected much more easily.
Instead, efforts to clean up the voter rolls never cause people to get caught. But they do cause many legitimate voters to lose the ability to vote.
- buckle8017 8mo ago[flagged]
- jfengel 8mo ago[flagged]
- buckle8017 8mo ago[flagged]
- CaptWillard 8mo ago> If cheating were widespread it would have been detected much more easily. This is a ridiculous assertion.