5 ms·
I laughed out loud when the author wrote 'it replaced nano'. So you are claiming to have tried dozens of editors, discarded them, only to land on nano as your
by gorjusborg 7mo ago
I laughed out loud when the author wrote 'it replaced nano'.
So you are claiming to have tried dozens of editors, discarded them, only to land on nano as your daily driver?
If that's true, this person must be a character.
- gammalost 7mo agoNo, the author used Howl for their normal work and Nano occasionally. I would guess when working in the terminal
- lpribis 7mo agoHe implied replacing nano was the first step, before using it for more complex (software development) tasks. First use it just for quick one-off edits of /etc/blah.conf then graduate to using it for longer editing sessions.
- zesterer 7mo agoNo, nano is not my daily driver. It's what I use when I want to quickly edit a file with root access because, funnily enough, I'm not in the habit of running my primary editor with superuser permissions :) Nano is a low-hanging fruit that was the first of many tools I gradually massaged the editor into replacing.