4 ms·
A more rigorous set of tests (including datasets that don't fit in memory, for instance) was presented at VLDB this year: http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1724_tilma
by jbellis 14y ago
A more rigorous set of tests (including datasets that don't fit in memory, for instance) was presented at VLDB this year: http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1724_tilmannrabl_vldb2012.pdf http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1724_tilmannrabl_vldb2012.pdf
- Mysterion 14y agoNote that this paper was discussed at the time on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4453500 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4453500 Some people were skeptical of the tuning for HBase, and an HBase developer criticized their methodology, given the especially poor performance shown for HBase. The paper authors themselves indicated that they had considerable trouble setting up the HBase system. Which in a way validates the comments of some here that HBase is fickle and can be difficult to tune, though it still means that the results in this paper for HBase are not valid, when compared to the other systems. In the interest of disclosure, it should be mentioned here that jbellis is a principle corporate backer of Cassandra.